You are here

Improving social inclusion in debate on REDD+ benefit-sharing in Brazil


To control and reduce deforestation in the Amazon, the Brazilian government created the National REDD+ Strategy (NRS), which has provided a framework to compensate entities protecting the Amazon along a jurisdictional scale (states). In 2015, to support the coordination and implementation of the NRS, the Brazilian Government established the National Commission for Reducing Emissions of Greenhouse Gases from Deforestation and Forest Degradation, Conservation of Forest Carbon Stocks, Sustainable Management of Forests and Increase in Carbon Stocks Forestry - REDD + (CONAREDD). Representing federal, state and municipal governments as well as local and civil society organizations, CONAREDD has worked to advance dialogue and cooperation amongst the various stakeholders and members. However, certain representatives of society, including indigenous people, smallholders, and traditional communities are still not fully included in the REDD+ debates. The process of how and to whom the benefits of Brazil’s NRS can be offered and allocated amongst the stakeholders of the Amazon forest states remains largely undetermined and un-informed.

Therefore, there is the need for a healthy debate about the alternatives for benefit-sharing mechanisms for REDD+ that reflects the interests of different social groups in the Amazon. PROFOR’s program seeks to engage with leaders of the Amazon and representatives of the states and federal governments to debate and devise options on benefit sharing that could support the NRS and the REDD+ initiatives of regional states.


PROFOR’s program will work closely with identified local organizations such as the Amazon Environmental Research Institute (IPAM), a Brazilian NGO that will be leading many of the activities, to conduct the following:   

  • Report on the current benefit-sharing mechanisms being used or proposed in Brazil;
  • Apply PROFOR’s Options Assessment Framework with stakeholders during a series of workshops to obtain recommendation on the benefit-sharing mechanism to be applied to Brazil’s context;
  • Develop an interim report based on stakeholder´s opinions derived from the Framework results;
  • Conduct a final workshop to discuss the benefit-sharing mechanisms identified;
  • Draw a best practice guide to implement the mechanisms identified during the workshops.


The Options Assessment Framework methodology proposed by PROFOR has the main goal to provide an evaluation of the context on capacities to implement REDD+ benefit sharing mechanisms. Many key points that need to be addressed by managers and donors in order to reach an efficient benefit sharing. Capacity building, for example, was a transversal necessity discussed by all the sectors interviewed. A common point is that stakeholders, in general, need more capacity building strengthening related to REDD+ concept and implementation in order to be included in the discussions.  Below, some important aspects detected:  
 For the institutional capacities:  
  • The workshops participants  claimed a higher participation of the private sector in the REDD+ process,  as a way to reach more robust mechanisms, not only as direct beneficiaries of carbon sequestration but as protagonists in the management of financial mechanisms that can enable a cost-effective forest-based economy. The argument is that the governmental machine has many bureaucracy, lack of agility and lack of transparence that commits the implementation of REDD+.   
  • Both national and subnational governments need to establish a closer dialogue with local actors, despite the dimensions, access difficulties and multiculturalism characteristic of the Amazon. This dialogue is key to improve their understanding of REDD+ and increase their participation in the whole process.  
  • Communities, although they are the protagonists of the process, have a marginal involvement so far. A heavy and intense process of leadership strengthening, and capacity building is one of the key measures that needs to be improved. 
  • The role of NGOs is fundamental in REDD+ initiatives. However, it is not their role to fulfill the obligations of the governments. Besides, NGOs need more resources to increase their capillarity and support more communities.  
  • The public sector should incorporate the variables of private management in the management of funds. Funds should be managed by the private sector, NGOs or both together.  
For the legal framework: 
  • The states developed their REDD+ strategies and policies before the federal government. Therefore, a harmonized approach  between Federal and State polices will be necessary. Such approach include mutual recognition, equivalency, and reference standards 
  • The consultations that are made to communities may not be valid since they can reflect better on their consent.     
For the monitoring capacities:  
  • In a transition to incentive policies for the conservation of forests, the command and control approaches continue to be essential in the routines of environmental agencies. 
  • Setting up a quality center for intelligence gathering and spatial monitoring is a critical, yet resource intensive task, requiring appropriate equipment and specialized human resources. Only through robust investments can states be able to monitor and deter illicit actions in a timely manner. 
  • The technology does not replace the human capacity to read the images, especially in natural features that are confused with deforestation and degradation. There is a lack of human resources able to do this job, as well as to exercise command and control actions, once the situations in which they should intervene have been detected. 
  • There is a major bottleneck in measures to detect and measure environmental degradation in relation to deforestation that needs to be observed. 
The challenge now is to think about ways to implement the enabling actions proposed. The national and subnational jurisdictions analyzed should be aware of its fragilities and invest time and resources in improving those capacities. The national and subnational levels analyzed are in different stages of implementation of REDD+ initiatives and need to be closely monitored for benefit sharing mechanisms to be implemented.  
Despite the great efforts being made at the federal level to structure a robust national REDD+ mechanism, much still needs to be done to reach a level that ensures a high level of institutional capacity. There is the necessity to make the government more efficient and less bureaucratic as a way to attract more investments. Also, the local / state governments capacity needs to be strengthened substantially to enable officials to be physically present and work effectively on forest policy and decision-making with community groups and the private sector actors. Communities’ capacities to support, monitor, and report local-level REDD+ programs and related activities are considered very insufficient in all jurisdictions (Federal, Acre, Mato Grosso and Amazonas).
Ironically, the most important stakeholders are the ones with the highest level of difficulties to access resources, to actively participate in REDD+ discussions and have a good comprehension of all the mechanisms involved. The private sector is not very prominent in the sites analyzed but there are some isolated initiatives of private groups. At the national level, Brazil has made much progress in transparency in environmental governance. The Federal Government has developed cutting-edge technological tools to monitor forest cover. The Amazon Deforestation Estimate Program (PRODES) is the national official database that promotes transparency and provides data accessible to the whole society.
However, it does not have a perfect capillarity for on the ground performance in a country with dimensions such as Brazil. Even with a good support of Federal funds for management building block, some challenges need to be overcome in its key components. An issue that needs more attention is the list of eligibility criteria imposed by funding agencies to access resources. Although the calls for proposals are open, normally communities are not well organized and prepared to apply to these calls. A recent issue is related to the future changes in policy or governance that may create discontinuity of the already established REDD+ policies and, consequently, undermine the progress already reached. 

For stories and updates on related activities, follow us on twitter and facebook, or to our mailing list for regular updates.

Last Updated : 06-09-2020